Want to trade crypto currency without having to submit yourself to KYC checks? Blofin is the best and most widely accessible crypto exchange, without the need to submit documentation. They have deep liquidity, great UX and a top mobile app. Sign up using the link below for a nice sign up bonus and some great rewards, including iPhones, Airpods and even a Rolex.

The Chancellor's fiscal cushion—the margin between planned spending and her self-imposed borrowing limits—has shrunk to just £9.9 billion, the joint-third lowest since the Office for Budget Responsibility was created in 2010. In gilt markets, where Britain's government borrows, yields have spiked on policy uncertainty. Sterling is wobbling. And Ms Reeves, unlike her predecessor Liz Truss, cannot afford to ignore what the markets are saying.

The comparison to Ms Truss is uncomfortably apt. In September 2022, Ms Truss's unfunded tax cuts triggered a bond market revolt, pension funds teetered on the brink, and she was out of Downing Street within weeks. Ms Reeves has been careful to avoid the same mistakes—she has committed to publishing independent forecasts, she is raising taxes rather than cutting them unfunded, she has pledged to follow fiscal rules. But the underlying dynamic is similar: a fragile government, skeptical markets, and vanishingly little room for error.

The arithmetic is brutal. Since March, the fiscal picture has deteriorated on multiple fronts. The OBR slashed its productivity growth forecasts, erasing £21 billion in expected revenues. Policy U-turns and new spending commitments added another £10 billion. Ms Reeves wants to rebuild her fiscal buffer to £15 billion, requiring yet more money.

Meanwhile, the economy is barely cooperating. GDP growth crawled along at 0.3% in the second quarter, down from 0.7% in the first. Inflation sits stubbornly at 3.6%. Unemployment has risen to 5%. For ordinary Britons, this translates to higher mortgage costs, squeezed household budgets, and a lingering sense that the cost-of-living crisis never really ended. For Ms Reeves, it means that every policy choice carries outsize risk.

What will the Chancellor do? Expect a "death by a thousand cuts" strategy—a litany of smaller tax increases, each designed to raise a few billion without triggering outright rebellion.

Property owners are squarely in the crosshairs. Council tax rates on homes in the highest bands are expected to double, raising £4 billion. A further "mansion tax" surcharge may follow, with payment deferred until the property is sold or the owner dies. Inheritance tax, already unpopular among middle-class families trying to pass wealth to their children, faces further restrictions on lifetime gifts and taper relief.

Then there is the stealth tax that keeps on giving: freezing income tax thresholds. By holding the thresholds constant while wages rise with inflation, the government drags millions more people into higher tax brackets each year without ever announcing a rate increase. Extended beyond 2028, this freeze could raise £10.4 billion—and most voters will barely notice until they check their payslips.

Capital gains tax could be aligned more closely with income tax bands, hitting anyone selling investments or second properties. Add to this National Insurance for landlords, new levies on electric vehicles that will particularly sting rural drivers, and cuts to cash ISA allowances from £20,000 to perhaps £10,000.

There will be modest winners. Business rates for small retail, hospitality, and leisure properties will fall, offering relief to struggling high streets. But make no mistake: this is a tax-raising Budget, and the burden falls heaviest on property owners and the moderately wealthy.

Bond traders have already delivered their verdict on the government's credibility—or lack thereof. Ten-year gilt yields hit 4.78% in October before settling around 4.53%, the highest since late 2023. That means higher borrowing costs for the government, which ultimately means higher costs for taxpayers. A single news report in recent weeks suggesting Ms Reeves might water down a planned tax rise sent yields spiking by 15 basis points in hours.

If she announces credible, frontloaded tax rises totaling £15 billion or more on Wednesday—measures that take effect soon rather than being deferred to some convenient future date—investors would likely buy gilts on relief. Yields could settle back toward 4.40%. Currency traders would push sterling higher from its current $1.33. Markets would take it as a sign that Britain is serious about fiscal discipline.

But if the Budget relies on vague promises of future spending cuts that few believe will materialize, or if the measures seem insufficient, investors will sell. Yields could breach 4.80%, possibly even 5%. Sterling would weaken further. Comparisons to the Truss mini-budget would intensify. Ms Reeves would find herself in the same trap that ensnared her predecessor: trying to govern while markets openly question whether she knows what she is doing.

The political stakes amplify the economic ones. Labour's poll ratings have collapsed through 2025. Prime Minister Keir Starmer faces mounting criticism within his own party. Local elections loom in May 2026, promising a reckoning. In July, brief speculation about Ms Reeves' job security—nothing more than Westminster gossip—was enough to rattle markets. Imagine what would happen if that speculation became serious.

The OBR will publish its forecasts alongside the Budget, and markets will scrutinize the growth projections and debt trajectory for any sign that the government's fiscal rules—debt falling as a share of GDP by the end of the Parliament—are under threat. Any downgrade, any hint of slippage, and the risk premium on British debt will widen immediately.

For ordinary Britons, the implications are tangible. If gilt yields rise further, mortgage rates will follow, hitting homeowners with variable-rate loans or those coming off fixed-rate deals. If sterling weakens, imported goods become more expensive, feeding inflation. If business confidence craters, hiring slows and wage growth stagnates. The Budget is not an abstraction; it is the framework within which millions of economic decisions will be made over the coming year.

Fund managers are pulling back from UK assets until they see how Wednesday unfolds. The Bank of England, which has an 80% probability of cutting interest rates by 25 basis points in December already priced in, may find its room for maneuver constrained if fiscal policy is too loose or if markets lose confidence.

Britain is hardly alone in grappling with fiscal pressures, but its position is more precarious than most. France faces similar deficits with even less political will for austerity. Germany has loosened its legendary fiscal discipline in response to security threats. Britain's challenge is that it runs a persistent current account deficit, meaning it relies on foreign investors to finance its spending. Those investors are watching Wednesday closely. Ms Reeves could have chosen to borrow more and let debt rise, gambling on growth to solve the problem later. She could have cut spending more aggressively, risking recession and political suicide. Instead, she has chosen the narrow path of broad-based tax rises—politically painful but economically defensible, provided she can hold her nerve.

At 12:30 PM on Wednesday, the Chancellor will stand at the dispatch box and reveal her choices. By close of business, we'll know whether she has steadied the ship—or whether Britain is heading for another autumn of fiscal chaos. The rest of us will pay for it in higher taxes, weaker growth, and years of fiscal constraint.

This week is the best time to buy TradingView, with massive black Friday deals across all levels. I use it everyday and swear highly from it. Even if you have time remaining, the months stack on top!

PrimeXBT offers max leverage across both crypto and traditional assets. Sign up here for some nice rewards.

None of this is financial advice. This is for educational purposes only and you should always do your own research. Leverage trading, including CFDs, is risky and you may lose money. Cryptocurrency is volatile and you should be prepared to lose all of your money. Wizard Macro Research are responsible for any losses you incur.